| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Godbout v Longueuil (City of) ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Godbout v Longueuil (City of)
''Godbout v Longueuil (City of)'', () 3 S.C.R. 844 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court found that the city of Longueuil that required all permanent employees to reside within the municipality was in violation of both the ''Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms'' and the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms''.
==Background==
Michèle Godbout was hired as a dispatcher for the Longueuil police force. As part of her employment she was required to sign a declaration that she would reside within the city and if she were to move outside of the city her employment would be terminated without notice. Initially she had lived within the city but soon bought a house in the nearby town of Chambly. When she refused to move back in she was fired.
Before the Superior Court of Quebec, the parties argued primarily as to whether the ''Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms'' and the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms''. Judge Turmel ruled that because the employment contract constituted a matter of private law between an employer (here the city of Longueuil) and an employee, neither charters applied, in so far as such rights as granted by the charters can, under civil law be willingly waived by contract.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Godbout v Longueuil (City of)」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|